ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
Prefrontal and ventral striatal neural correlates of reversal learning in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Eating and Mental Health Disorders.Nutrients · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Difficulty with reversal learning (RL)-appropriately shifting behavior following outcome contingency changes-may represent a shared or distinct mechanism across eating disorder (ED) diagnoses. We tested whether RL-related neural correlates differ among adults without and with EDs (anorexia nervosa, restricting subtype [AN-R], AN binge-eating/purging subtype [AN-BP], and bulimia nervosa [BN]) and whether these correlates correspond to ED-symptom severity and frequency. We hypothesized that individuals with EDs would demonstrate differential neural activation during RL relative to individuals without, that activation would differentiate AN-BP and BN versus AN-R, and that activation would predict ED-severity metrics. Medically stable participants with AN-R (n = 22), AN-BP (n = 20), and BN (n = 29) comprised the ED group (N = 71), contrasted with non-ED controls (N = 27). Participants (91% female; M
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.