ArticleScientific reports2025
Magnetic resonance imaging thresholds and diagnostic accuracy in unilateral congenital superior oblique muscle palsy using the ESA method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of unilateral congenital superior oblique muscle (SOM) palsy relies on a cluster of clinical findings due to the absence of a definitive confirmation test. This study aimed to compare qualitative and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based assessments and to define a standardized quantitative threshold for diagnosing SOM atrophy. Patients with unilateral congenital SOM palsy who underwent orbital MRI, matched with age- and sex-paired controls were included. MRI images were assessed qualitatively (SOM atrophy) and quantitatively (surface and area measurements along the muscle axis) using multiplanar reconstructions. Ratios between the paralytic and non-paralytic SOM, as well as the inferior rectus muscle as a control, were analyzed. Inter-rater reliability, diagnostic thresholds, and diagnostic performance of quantitative measurements were evaluated. A total of 120 subjects (60 patients and 60 controls) were included. The inter-rater agreement for SOM atrophy detection was good to excellent for both qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative assessment identified SOM atrophy in 46.7–48.3% of cases, while quantitative analysis showed significantly smaller SOM surface and area on the affected side (p < 0.001). The optimum diagnostic thresholds for SOM palsy were a surface ratio < 0.9 or an area ratio < 0.8 between the paralytic and non-paralytic SOM, correctly diagnosing 78.3% of cases while yielding a 10% false-positive rate. As a complement strategy to trochlear nerve visualization, a stepwise approach combining qualitative and quantitative assessments enhances the evaluation of SOM atrophy. The Eye-Surface-Area (ESA) method including three steps (1) Qualitative assessment (2) Surface measurement and (3) Area measurement provides a reliable method for identifying SOM atrophy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.