ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
Bladder cancer diagnostic and prognostic models from DNA methylation by multi algorithm machine learning.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a multimodal AI-agent system for prognosis analysis of bladder urothelial carcinoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Cuproptosis-associated PDHA1 promotes sarcoma progression and immunotherapy responsiveness via the E2F1-PD-L1 axis: a multi-omics and clinical validation study.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to identify core DNA methylation sites linked to urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) and to develop prognostic and early diagnostic models using multi-sample datasets from tissue, blood, and urine. By applying six machine learning algorithms, we constructed a diagnostic signature based on four DNA methylation sites and a prognostic signature involving ten sites. The diagnostic model showed high accuracy in detecting bladder cancer in both tissue and urine samples, while the prognostic model effectively predicted survival outcomes. Further analyses revealed associations with survival, enriched pathways, immune infiltration, genetic mutations, and responses to immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Cellular experiments, including Q-PCR, WB, Co-IP, and ChIP, demonstrated that C1QTNFNF6 significantly influences UBC prognosis and that TET2 promotes demethylation of C1QTNFNF6, elevating its expression and accelerating tumor progression. These findings present eleven key methylation sites with strong clinical applicability for diagnosis and prognosis in UBC, and reveal an epigenetic mechanism involving TET2 and C1QTNFNF6 that drives disease development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.