Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41298853›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Detection of brain network abnormalities by graph invariants in Alzheimer's disease using MRI images.

G NallappaBhavithran, R Selvakumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G NallappaBhavithranDepartment of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
R SelvakumarDepartment of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India. rselvakumar@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease is a major cause of dementia in older adults. It involves gradual changes in brain function that result in cognitive decline, affecting memory, reasoning, and executive skills. The accurate detection of structural abnormalities in brain networks is crucial for early diagnosis and disease staging. This study presents a graph-based framework that analyzes abnormalities in brain networks of Alzheimer's patients using six distance-based topological indices: Szeged index, Graovac-Ghorbani index, Padmakar-Ivan index, Mostar index, Wiener index, and Normalized Graovac-Ghorbani index. These indices effectively characterize the structural properties of brain networks and identify disruptions linked to disease progression. The proposed framework first constructs brain graphs from MRI images using the Brightness Distance Matrix method, which captures the spatial relationships between pixels. Then, the constructed brain graphs are modeled using the Watts and Strogatz small-world model to normalize the topological indices. The normalized indices serve as input features for various machine learning models, including decision trees, logistic regression, support vector machines, and a multi-layer neural network. Among these models, a refined neural network model achieves the highest classification accuracy of 89.45%, confirming the value of topological indices as interpretable biomarkers for disease staging. This framework demonstrates the potential of graph-theoretic approaches for detecting Alzheimer's-related brain network alterations and offers a scalable, interpretable, and privacy-friendly solution.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineBrain graphNeural networkSmall-world networks.Topological indicesWS model

Identifiers

PMID41298853
PMCPMC12657926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.