ArticleScientific reports2025
Microstructural, mechanical characterization and ANN prediction of concrete with glass fiber roving waste.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an experimental and computational framework for the production of sustainable concrete reinforced with glass fiber roving waste (GFRW). This study combines laboratory testing, microstructural analysis, and artificial neural network (ANN) modeling to assess and enhance the mechanical properties of GFRW-reinforced concrete. A total of 145 samples were cast using different mix proportions and fiber conditions, with fiber contents of 1%, 2%, and 3% and lengths of 3, 6, 9, and 12 mm. The mixtures containing 6 mm fibers at about 1-2% volume fraction showed the most balanced performance, producing clear gains in compressive, tensile, and flexural strength compared with the control mix. The ANN model-trained with five-fold cross-validation-achieved strong predictive accuracy (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.