Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41298819›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

Knockoff-ML: a knockoff machine learning framework for controlled variable selection and risk stratification in electronic health record data.

Qi Wang, Linyan Li, Yi Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qi WangDepartment of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR.
Linyan LiDepartment of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR. linyanli@cityu.edu.hk.
Yi YangDepartment of Biostatistics, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR. yi.yang@cityu.edu.hk.

Funding

City University of Hong Kong Strategic Interdisciplinary Research Grant 7020097Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Early Career Scheme 21303323Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Early Career Scheme 21607223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective risk stratification is essential in clinical practice, enabling better resource allocation and improved patient outcomes. Although machine learning models have been widely used for risk prediction and stratification in electronic health record (EHR) data, conventional interpretability metrics for machine learning models typically lack decision rules for clinicians to determine which patient features significantly influence outcomes. We proposed Knockoff-ML, a model-free machine learning framework that simultaneously accomplishes outcome prediction and identification of risk features through integrating a knockoff framework with various predictive machine learning algorithms. Specifically, Knockoff-ML augments traditional machine learning models with the knockoff framework that enables machine learning models to perform variable selection with false discovery rate (FDR) control in the presence of complex, nonlinear associations between features and outcomes in EHR data. We extensively evaluated Knockoff-ML in both simulations and real-data applications. Our simulation results demonstrated that Knockoff-ML consistently achieved high statistical power to identify risk features while rigorously controlling the FDR, whereas conventional feature selection methods exhibited inflated FDR in most scenarios. In applications to a cohort of 50,591 intensive care unit (ICU) patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database, Knockoff-ML identified risk features significantly associated with short- and long-term mortality. Prediction models with identified risk features in Knockoff-ML also achieved comparable prediction accuracy with full models using all available features. Furthermore, Knockoff-ML exhibited substantially higher predictive power and clinical utility compared to conventional ICU scoring systems such as SOFA and SAPS II. The robust performance and interpretability of Knockoff-ML make it a useful tool for enhancing clinical decision-making, with the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes and optimize healthcare delivery.

Identifiers

PMID41298819
PMCPMC12657878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.