ArticleScientific reports2025
Fault diagnosis using ISMA to optimize SVM parameters for aircraft engine damage repair.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aviation engines, as vital aircraft components, encounter challenges in Condition Monitoring (CM) signal fault diagnosis, including low accuracy and poor real-time performance. To tackle these, by integrating an Auto-Encoder (AE) and Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit (BiGRU), this study proposes an AE-BiGRU-based fault signal feature extraction model for aviation engines. Then, an ISMA-SVM-based aviation engine CM signal fault diagnosis method is introduced, employing the Improved Slime Mould Algorithm (ISMA) to optimize Support Vector Machine (SVM) parameters. The findings reveal that in function optimization, the ISMA exhibits stronger variance reduction in both unimodal and multimodal functions, particularly in the latter. In terms of fault diagnosis, the model performs excellently in precision (0.90), recall (0.95), and F1 score (0.92), achieving the best performance in the C-MAPSS dataset prediction. Case applications show their advantages in extracting weak fault signals and identifying fault frequencies, enhancing aviation engine fault diagnosis, safeguarding health status, and aiding damage repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.