ArticleScientific reports2025
Performance investigation of Xanthan gum polymer flooding for enhanced oil recovery using machine learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative assessment of machine learning models for polymer solution viscosity prediction in enhanced oil recovery.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Considering the importance of oil as a major global energy source and the decreasing discovery of new reservoirs, enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods have attracted considerable attention to maximize production from existing fields. Among these methods, polymer flooding, especially using Xanthan gum, is highly effective. Xanthan gum was chosen as the focus of this study due to its wide availability, low cost and environmental compatibility which make it one of the most practical biopolymer candidates for EOR applications. However, EOR processes are sensitive and require extensive investigations, while field and laboratory experiments are often costly and time-consuming. This study introduces a machine learning-based model which enables petroleum engineers to quickly assess whether Xanthan gum polymer flooding is feasible for a given reservoir, eliminating the need for extensive experiments. Ten parameters API gravity, initial oil saturation (%), polymer concentration (ppm), porosity (%), salinity (wt%), rock type, pore volume flooding, permeability (md), oil viscosity (cp.), and temperature (°C) were used as inputs to five machine learning models, including neural networks such as multilayer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), radial basis function (RBF), gated recurrent units (GRUs), and support vector regression (SVR). Among these, MLP (R² = 0.9930) and GRUs (R² = 0.9933) achieved the best predictions. These models provide a fast and cost-effective tool for petroleum engineers to make timely decisions regarding the use of Xanthan gum in EOR operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.