Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41298771›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The impacts of access infrastructure on temperate and boreal peatlands.

Samuel W Booth, Nicholas G Midgley, Thomas Clewer, Laura Turner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel W BoothSchool of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England. sam.booth@nottingham.ac.uk.
Nicholas G MidgleySchool of Animal, Rural & Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, England.
Thomas ClewerSchool of Animal, Rural & Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, England.
Laura TurnerSchool of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peatlands, ecosystems rich in organic matter, serve as substantial global carbon sinks and provide numerous ecosystem services. However, they face significant anthropogenic threats, including the construction and use of linear features such as roads, tracks, trails, and footpaths. This systematic review investigates the impacts of these linear features on temperate and boreal peatlands by analysing 81 primary research articles sourced from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, from an initial return of 831 articles. The findings reveal that 73 articles reported significant impacts, predominantly negative, on peatland features and processes in 5 broad categories: soil, vegetation, hydrology, wildlife, and fire dynamics. This includes soil compaction and erosion, plant community change through introduction of non-natives, altered preferential water flow, changes in predator-prey relationships and providing sources of ignition. Roads are the most studied linear feature, followed by tracks/trails and then footpaths, however linear feature type had no significant impact on the net direction of impact which was predominantly negative across feature type. This suggests that there may be a bias in research towards roads owing to their greater permanence and use, despite consistent negative impacts across feature types. Linear feature type also has no impact on the frequency of features/process impacted, which suggests that different types of linear feature impact broadly in similar ways, but it is the scale and severity of this impact that varies between feature types with different characteristics. Soil was negatively impacted significantly more than hydrology, wildlife and fire dynamics, but equal to vegetation, which was impacted significantly more than wildlife and fire dynamics. Impacts to soil and vegetation are easily observable at local and landscape scale, which again supports the premise that linear feature categories have similar impacts, but the scale and severity may vary. This work highlights that while substantial research has focused on the adverse effects of roads, there is a notable gap in understanding the specific impacts of other linear features, and future work should focus on evaluating impacts across linear feature categories and scales, to inform sustainable management practices.

Identifiers

PMID41298771
PMCPMC12739162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.