ArticleScientific reports2025
Persistence of motor-cognitive inhibition deficits in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD): a longitudinal perspective.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this longitudinal study was to investigate how double-jump reaching task (DJRT) performance varies as a function of inhibitory load in children (6-12 years) with severe and moderate forms of developmental coordination disorder (s-DCD and m-DCD, respectively), compared with typically developing children (TDC). We tested 20 s-DCD, 43 m-DCD, and 192 TDC children, divided into younger (6-8 years) and older (9-12 years) age bands within each motor group. Children were tested twice, the second time after a 1-year follow-up, on two DJRT versions: standard (DJRT) and anti-jump (AJRT). Stimuli for each task appeared on a 42-inch touchscreen with a central home base and three target locations at - 20°, 0°, and 20°, 40 cm above the home base. For the DJRT, children lifted their index finger from the home base to the displayed target; 80% of trials were non-jump (to the central target) and 20% were jump where the target shifted left or right at lift-off. For the AJRT, they instead pointed to the contralateral location on anti-jump trials. Movement time difference measured the time difference between jump/anti-jump and no-jump trials. For the DJRT, there was no motor group effect, while older children made faster adjustments to jump targets. For the AJRT, the s-DCD group was consistently slower and had a significantly larger MTdiff score than both the m-DCD and TDC groups, regardless of age. The findings indicate that while cognitive-motor coupling improves with age in children with DCD, those with s-DCD have persistent difficulties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.