ArticleScientific reports2025
Mental health assessment model for college students based on facial expression recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An algorithm for optimizing psychological regulation strategies for college students based on image recognition and reinforcement learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal transformer and directed relational graph learning for emotion recognition in conversations with potential applications in college student mental health research.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the increasingly prominent mental health issues in universities, how to achieve rapid and objective identification of psychological states has become a research focus. The research proposes a mental health assessment model for college students that integrates facial expression recognition and deep learning technology, combining dynamic and static facial expression information to raise the accuracy and efficiency of recognition. This model is based on a dual branch structure, using a hierarchical sliding window Transformer with optical flow graph input to extract dynamic features, and MobileViT with convolution and attention fusion to extract static peak frame features. Cross branch feature interaction and fusion are achieved through a cross attention module. The findings denote that the accuracy of the proposed model reaches 0.945, the F1 value is 0.934, and the AUC value is as high as 0.963. At the same time, the average response time of the model is only 2.2 s, and the training time is 2.6 s, which has better computational efficiency while ensuring accuracy. The proposed method shows significant advantages in the accuracy of abnormal state recognition, training stability, and generalization ability. The research results indicate that the fusion model can serve as an effective supplement to the psychological health warning system in universities, providing intelligent technical support for emotion recognition driven psychological interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.