Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41298730›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Temperature driven density gradients of two congeneric felids reveal contrasting responses to climate change at a range margin.

Sujay Singh, Daniel Thornton, Lindsay Welfelt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sujay SinghWashington State University, PO Box 642812, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA. sujay.singh@wsu.edu.
Daniel ThorntonWashington State University, PO Box 642812, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Lindsay WelfeltWashington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 3515, 97 ALT, Wenatchee, WA, 98801, USA.

Funding

USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, McIntire-Stennis Project 1018967U.S. Geological Survey Northwest Climate Adaptation Science Center G23AC00517Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 23-20522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change causes divergent range shifts in cold versus warm-tolerant species, potentially reshuffling biotic interactions at range margins. Yet, outside of coarse distributional metrics, little information exists regarding the ecology of species along range peripheries. Here, we use camera traps and spatially-explicit-capture-recapture (secr) modeling to examine how climatic gradients influence current and future patterns of density, abundance, and density overlap between two congeneric felids - cold-adapted Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) and warm-adapted bobcats (Lynx rufus) - at a range margin in Washington, United States. Temperature drove density patterns along the range margin, with lynx densities declining and bobcat densities increasing as a function of temperature. Future abundances, obtained via projection of current-day models onto future climate scenarios, declined for lynx but were stable for bobcats, with both species experiencing upward elevational shifts. Areas of the landscape with high-lynx and low-bobcat densities declined in the future, but areas with low-lynx and high-bobcat densities increased, with only limited high-elevation refugia for lynx from expanding bobcat populations. Our approach reveals how temperature gradients shape density patterns of cold and warm-tolerant mammals and could be applied to other species and montane systems to better understand mammalian population trajectories and spatial associations at range edges.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionClimate ChangeLynxTemperatureAnimalsCattleFood ChainHaresPopulation DensityWashingtonBobcatCamera trapCanada lynxRange marginSECRTemperature

Identifiers

PMID41298730
PMCPMC12748809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.