ArticleScientific reports2025
Anomaly detection in double-entry bookkeeping data by federated learning system with non-model sharing approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anomaly detection is crucial in financial auditing, yet effective detection often requires large volumes of data from multiple organizations. However, confidentiality concerns hinder data sharing among audit firms. Existing journal entry anomaly detectors built on model-sharing federated learning (FL) mitigate data transfer but still demand multiple parameter-exchange rounds with external servers, forcing devices holding confidential data onto networks. We propose a new framework based on data collaboration (DC) analysis, a non-model-sharing FL technique that enables anomaly detection without requiring confidential data to be directly connected to external networks. Our method first encodes journal entry data via dimensionality reduction to obtain secure intermediate representations, then transforms them into collaboration representations for building an autoencoder. Notably, the approach does not require raw data to be exposed or devices to connect to external networks, and the process needs only one round of communication. We evaluated the framework on synthetic and real journal entry datasets from eight organizations. Experiments show the DC-based approach not only surpasses models trained locally but also outperforms model-sharing FL methods such as FedAvg and FedProx, especially under non-i.i.d. conditions reflecting practical audits. This work demonstrates how organizational knowledge can be integrated while preserving confidentiality, advancing practical intelligent auditing systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.