ArticleScientific reports2025
Similarity measure of time series based on Angle-distance Penalized Metric Dynamic Time Warping.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Measuring the similarity of time series is a fundamental task in numerous information processing applications. Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) is a widely used method for time series similarity measurement, yet its reliance solely on linear Euclidean distance and neglect of directional information often limits its ability in scenarios where subtle variations and trajectory orientation carry semantic significance. To address these limitations, we propose Angle-distance Penalized Metric DTW (APMDTW), a novel similarity measure method that integrates a nonlinear spatial distance metric with an adaptive angle-distance penalty. Specifically, a piecewise logarithmic transformation is introduced to enhance sensitivity to fine-grained local differences, while a parameterized angle-distance penalty, adaptively modulated by spatial distance, incorporates directional consistency into the cost function. This joint modeling of spatial magnitude and geometric orientation yields a more discriminative and robust time series similarity measurement. Experiments on 128 UCR benchmark datasets show that APMDTW outperforms six baseline algorithms on 114 datasets, and improves similarity measurement accuracy by an average of 56.52% over six state-of-the-art DTW variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.