Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41298673›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The response of meteorological drought to extreme climate in the water-receiving area of the Tao river diversion project in China.

Huimin Hou, Di Lu, Dongmeng Zhou, Junxing Bai, Feng Guo, Changjie Chen, Junde Wang, Yufei Cheng, Zhiqiang Bao, Haohao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Coupled machine learning-ecosystem ensemble models substantially improve predictions of nitrous oxide (NProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Huimin HouSchool of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Di LuSchool of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730000, China. 18119468680@163.com.
Dongmeng ZhouState Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Junxing BaiSchool of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Feng GuoSchool of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Changjie ChenSchool of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Junde WangGansu Provincial Hydrology and Water Resources Center, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Yufei ChengGansu Academy for Water Conservancy, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Zhiqiang BaoSchool of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Haohao LiSchool of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730000, China.

Funding

Gansu Province Water Conservancy Research and Planning Project 23GSLK044Gansu provincial key research and development program 23YFFA0018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Against the backdrop of increasing global extreme climate events, the water-receiving area of the Tao River Diversion Project in China frequently experiences drought disasters. In view of this, this study uses the meteorological drought index (SPEI) and 12 extreme climate indicators to analyze drought and extreme climate changes and their effects on drought. The results show that SPEI12 presents a slow but persistent downward trend, with 1988 as the turning point. Drought frequency exhibited a spatial pattern of being lower in the northwest and higher in the southeast. Additionally, droughts occurred more frequently but were of shorter duration. The summer days (SU) and warm days and warm nights (TX 90p, TN 90p) increased significantly. Although extreme precipitation events increased, the magnitude of change was not significant and thus could not effectively counteract the drought trend. Annual total precipitation (PRCPTOT), cold days (TX10p) and summer days (SU) are the main driving factors of meteorological drought, and their contribution rates are 23.35, 18.93 and 14.75% respectively. Annual total precipitation (PRCPTOT) and summer days (SU) have linear relationship with meteorological drought, and extreme climate indexes such as warm spell duration index (WSDI) and warm nights (TN90p) have nonlinear changes. Especially, the consecutive wet days (CWD) has a significant nonlinear change, when less than 8.58 days will lead to wetting, more than 8.58 days will lead to drought. In response to pressures from a warmer and drier future climate, the agricultural sector can build adaptive capacity. This can be achieved through the adjustment of planting structures, the promotion of water-saving technologies, and the incorporation of machine learning-derived thresholds into drought monitoring systems to enhance their early warning capabilities.

Identifiers

PMID41298673
PMCPMC12658032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.