ArticleScientific reports2025
Modeling loess collapsibility using oedometer tests for foundation and pile settlement prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanical Properties and Freeze-Thaw Cycling Degradation of Loess Improved with an Ionic Curing Agent and Cement Composite.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To enhance the construction foundation safety in the loess regions of Northwest China, this study systematically investigated the collapsibility characteristics of loess from a construction site in Lanzhou through laboratory collapse tests under constant pressure. Regression modeling was employed to quantitatively evaluate the influence of key geotechnical parameters-including natural density, dry density, moisture content, void ratio, and compression modulus-on the collapsibility coefficient. Significant relationships were established between the collapsibility coefficient and void ratio, natural moisture content, and compression modulus. Furthermore, the standard method was used to determine the variation of potential collapse around piles with depth, revealing an exponential distribution trend. It is worth emphasizing that this study successfully developed an exponential function model based on easily obtainable parameters (natural density, dry density, moisture content, and compression modulus) for quantitatively predicting the collapsibility coefficient. In contrast to existing models, which often rely on single indicators and lack a multi-parameter collaborative evaluation system-resulting in limited engineering applicability-this study integrated five parameters to construct a comprehensive prediction model, filling the gap in multi-index evaluation systems. This model provides a practical tool for more accurately predicting loess collapse settlement and can be directly applied to risk assessment and mitigation design for building foundations and pile-soil interactions in similar loess environments in Northwest China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.