ArticleScientific reports2025
Quantifying and modeling respirable dust and crystalline silica exposure in rice mills using the CART algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to quantify respirable dust (RD) and respirable crystalline silica (RCS) exposure in rice mills of Western India, and, evaluating their association with rice varieties and operational activities using CART algorithm to handle missing data. Fifty RD samples were collected from breathing zones of workers across mills processing different rice varieties, post which corresponding RCS levels were quantified. Statistical analyses in Minitab and R, incorporating CART-imputed datasets, revealed that operational activities significantly influenced RD (22.55%) and RCS (10.59%) variability (p < 0.05), while rice varieties showed minimal impact. Dehusking operations exhibited highest RD and RCS concentrations with notable variability, while sieving operations reported lowest exposures. Amongst rice varieties, Kolam reported highest RD levels, whereas Parimal the lowest. RCS levels were higher in Kolam and Parimal varieties as compared to IR-8, but within occupational exposure limits. ANOVA confirmed the model's statistical robustness. Overall, as compared to existing literature, RD and RCS levels were reportedly lower in this study, possibly due to advanced processing technologies and regional soil variations. The study emphasized need for enhanced dust control, particularly in high-exposure tasks like dehusking. It was also suggestive towards refining predictive accuracy with additional environmental data for rice mill settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.