ArticleScientific reports2025
Evolution of trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem service values and visualization of driving factors-a case study of the middle reaches of the Yellow River.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ecosystem services (ES), as a link between human activities and natural ecosystems, are crucial for maintaining ecological balance and supporting economic development. Ecosystem Services Value (ESV) is an indicator used to quantify ecosystem services. Accurately estimating the dynamics of ESV and its influencing factors is significant for regional sustainable development. This paper constructs an ESV valuation model incorporating construction land based on the modified equivalence factor method. It also examines the dynamic evolution of land use and ESV in the study area, as well as the interactions and influencing factors of ESV, using methods such as land-use transition matrix, ESV trade-off and synergy analysis, and XGBoost-SHAP models. The results show that: (1) during the study period, the changes in the single dynamics of cultivated land and construction land in the middle reaches of the Yellow River were significant, at -2.953% and 1.897%, respectively. The overall land dynamic rate averaged 0.152%, peaking between 2005 and 2010. Land-use type conversion was mainly between cultivated land, forest, and grassland. (2) ESV in the middle reaches of the Yellow River gradually decreased, with a total reduction of 21.951%. Areas with lower and middle ESV values contracted, while the remaining levels expanded, showing a spatial distribution pattern of decreasing from northwest to southeast. (3) The degree and direction of interactions between various ecosystem services in the study area changed over the 24 years, with the extremes of trade-off and synergy increasing. The relationship between water supply services and other services was the most significant. (4) Nighttime light brightness was the primary factor affecting ESV changes in the middle reaches of the Yellow River. Average slope, forest proportion, and annual average temperature had a positive impact on ESV, while nighttime light brightness, cultivated land proportion, population density, and average elevation had a negative impact. Other factors had minimal influence. The findings of this study provide important theoretical support for the formulation of targeted ecological protection measures, promoting the sustainable development of the Yellow River Basin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.