ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-marker GWAS and variant-specific genomic prediction for growth traits in Pacific white shrimp.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The genome of Penaeus vannamei is rich in short tandem repeats (STRs), occupying 18.96% of the genome, with 68.6% of loci showing high polymorphic information content, highlighting their potential as molecular markers. Accordingly, we performed an integrative GWAS leveraging STR, SNP, and InDel markers to identify 78 growth-associated loci, including 17 additional STRs compared with single-marker GWAS and six high-linkage regions containing metabolic, molting, and other growth-related genes. Four markers were validated in an independent population. In genomic prediction, STRs outperformed SNPs under the GBLUP model at low marker densities (20-50 loci), with accuracy gains up to 183%. GWAS-informed marker selection improved cross-population prediction performance, with STR-Top sets enhancing accuracy by 0.6%-3.0% under the GBLUP model, while SNP-Top sets achieved greater and more consistent gains under the KRR model. These results demonstrate the utility of STRs and support multi-marker integration for trait dissection and breeding in aquatic animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.