ArticleScientific reports2025
Travel experiences documented in online reviews influence travelers' travel intentions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Online travel reviews (OTRs) have revolutionized the way travelers plan their trips. While previous studies have investigated the impact of OTR attributes on travel intention, little attention has been paid to the impact of travel experiences documented in OTRs. Moreover, prior research has primarily used net effect methods, overlooking the possibility that combinations of different travel experiences may jointly influence travel intention. Based on experiential marketing theory, this study investigates how sensory, affective, behavioral, and intellectual experiences jointly affect travel intention. We collected 9242 online reviews and analyzed them with negative binomial regression and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. The findings reveal that sensory, behavioral, affective, and intellectual experiences documented in OTRs form multiple combinations and jointly influence travel intention. Our study contributes to the literature by revealing that the combinations of different travel experiences can affect travel intention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.