ArticleScientific reports2025
Molecular docking, DFT calculation and molecular dynamics simulation of Triazine-based covalent organic framework as a nanocarrier for delivering anti-cancer drug.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cinerascensosides A and B, Two New Cytotoxic Sulfated Saponins From the Sea Cucumber Holothuria cinerascens.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
- Curcumin-Loaded Cellulose Nanofibers for Breast Cancer Therapy: A Multiscale Computational and Experimental Evaluation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have attracted attention as novel nanocarriers for anticancer drug delivery due to their properties such as large surface area, tunable porosity, and customizable surface capabilities. In this study, the absorption of imatinib (IMA) as an anticancer drug on a triazine-based COF was investigated through computational methods. Docking simulation was employed to identify potential binding sites and estimate the binding energy of imatinib on COF. The mean binding energy was calculated to be -6.43 kcal/mole, which is predominantly attributed to the π-π stacking interaction. Then, the most favorable complexes with good binding energies were selected for density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The calculations were performed using the ONIOM method in the presence of molecular water effects using the PCM model. The absorption energies ranged from 21.4 to 27.60 kcal/mol for the studied complex. For a deeper analysis of the interactions, natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis and quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) were used. In addition, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed to evaluate the IMA -COF complexes in aqueous environments. Based on the results, vdW interactions played an important role in the stability of the drug molecule in both inside and outside of the COF cavity. Also, the diffusion of IMA within the COF was investigated by mean square displacement (MSD) analysis which showed the restricted mobility of IMA within the COF compared to the aqueous media. The results of this study confirm the ability of COFs as drug delivery systems and suggest the targeted design of these structures according to the drug structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.