ArticleScientific reports2025
Terpene content in the air of younger and older forests in southeastern Poland: implications for forest therapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Composition of Diagnostic Assessment Sheet Items for Developing a Personalized Forest Therapy Program for Patients with Depression: Application of the Delphi Technique.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate differences in terpene content level in the air within younger and older forests of the same species. Conducted from July 18 to October 2 in Nemoral Scots pine and Central European submontane beech forests, air samples were collected using portable aspirators with Tenax TA sorbent tubes. The compounds were identified and quantified using gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. Results showed that older forests emitted more volatile organic compounds (VOCs) than younger ones. Regardless of forest age or species, α-pinene was the most prevalent terpene, accounting for 7.4-12.9% of total VOCs. Other terpenes, such as β-pinene and camphene, were found in lower concentrations (1.7-12.7 times less). In Scots pine, higher α-pinene concentrations were observed in older forests, while younger forests had higher levels of 3-carene and α-terpinene. For beech, higher concentrations of camphene and β-pinene were found in younger forests. In nearly half of the cases, TVOC values and terpene concentrations showed moderate variability (25-45%), with high variability (> 45%) recorded in the remainder. Considering the quantitative and qualitative structure of terpenes, an older pine forest would be most suitable for supporting the treatment of respiratory diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.