ArticleScientific reports2025
Identifying regulators of aged fibroblast activation in 3D tissue models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robust 3D tissue culture models to activate aged fibroblasts for cell-based therapies and identify regulators of such activation are still missing. In our previous study, we showed that aged fibroblasts can be activated simply through applying compressive force, without the need for exogenous factors, leading to increased migration. In this study, we develop a pipeline to evaluate the role of specific pharmacological inhibitors for transcription factor inference and cell migration involved in aged fibroblast activation. By integrating RNA-seq data with bioinformatic tools (prize collecting Steiner tree method and iRegulon) we inferred 15 candidates. In addition, we used cell migration and heterochromatin content as readouts for validating these candidates. Furthermore, we identified three potential master regulators of fibroblast activation and rejuvenation: FOXO1, STAT3, and PDK1. These findings offer valuable insights for future drug discovery, disease modeling, and regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.