ArticleNature communications2025
Laser-assisted microbial culturomics.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Microbial biobanking: safeguarding the tiny treasures for sustainable human welfare.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Materials, Processes, and Emerging Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Even though metagenomics have revolutionized the characterization of the human microbiome, detailed mechanistic studies are impracticable, as there is a dearth of robust culture collections. We now describe the development and use of a laser-assisted culturomics platform, incorporating the elements of a bioprinter, the culture conditions, the methods to characterize the microorganisms and a biobank. With laser-assisted bioprinting, the microorganisms can be rapidly and precisely transferred from clinical biofilms to highly organized arrays of microbial colonies, which are suitable for co-culturing and molecular analyses. The presented technique has propagated 99 of 100 microbial species and recovered 79% of abundant species from dental plaque in accordance with full 16S rRNA gene profiling of 691,199 sequences. Microscopy, spectroscopy and enzyme assays have been used to guide isolations. Processing of oral biofilms from four individuals has yielded 249 representative isolates, from 14 classes and 124 species in total. Functional profiling with bioprinting has indicated commensals which could potentially contribute to disease development. Isolates from peri-implantitis cover 85.4% of the transcriptionally active clinical biofilms at genus level. Taken together, this work provides the basis for generating on-demand culture collections and biofilms for research and clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.