ArticleScientific reports2025
Numerical investigation of cracking behaviors in rock with interrupted double cross fractures under Brazilian splitting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The stability of underground engineering in coal mines is influenced by the tensile properties of fractured rock masses. In this study, the finite element method with embedded zero-thickness cohesive elements (FEM-CZM) was employed to conduct numerical simulations of Brazilian splitting tests on specimens containing double intersecting pre-existing fractures, and the influence of fracture parameters on crack propagation characteristics was analyzed. The results indicate that the tensile stress zones are primarily distributed around the pre-existing fractures, while the compressive stress zones are mainly located at the central top and bottom of the specimen. The tips of the pre-existing fractures serve as stress concentration zones, and tensile failure is the primary cause of crack initiation. With the increase in the rock bridge inclination angle and main fracture inclination angle, both the number of cracks and the crack area show an upward trend. As the rock bridge length increases, the number of crack initiations and the crack area initially decrease slightly and then increase significantly. As the angle between main and secondary fractures increases, the number and density of cracks increase. The research findings provide a more scientific theoretical basis and design guidance for engineering stability assessment and disaster prevention.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.