Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41298548›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Reconstructing music perception from brain activity using a prior guided diffusion model.

Matteo Ciferri, Matteo Ferrante, Nicola Toschi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matteo CiferriDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. matteo.ciferri@students.uniroma2.eu.
Matteo FerranteDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Nicola ToschiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Funding

European Union's European Innovation Council 101070908European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme 101017727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstructing music directly from brain activity provides insight into the neural representations underlying auditory processing and paves the way for future brain-computer interfaces. We introduce a fully data-driven pipeline that combines cross-subject functional alignment with bayesian decoding in the latent space of a diffusion-based audio generator. Functional alignment projects individual fMRI responses onto a shared representational manifold, increasing the performance of cross-participant accuracy with respect to anatomically normalized baselines. A bayesian search over latent trajectories then selects the most plausible waveform candidate, stabilizing reconstructions against neural noise. Crucially, we bridge CLAP's multi-modal embeddings to music-domain latents through a dedicated aligner, eliminating the need for hand-crafted captions and preserving the intrinsic structure of musical features. Evaluated on ten diverse genres, the model achieves a cross-subject-averaged identification accuracy of [Formula: see text], and produces audio that human listeners recognize above chance in 85.7% of trials. Voxel-wise analyses locate the predictive signal within a bilateral circuit spanning early auditory, inferior-frontal, and premotor cortices, consistent with hierarchical and sensorimotor theories of music perception. The framework establishes a principled bridge between generative audio models and cognitive neuroscience.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionBrainMusicAcoustic StimulationAdultBayes TheoremBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, NeurologicalYoung AdultAuditory perceptionBrain decodingCognitive scienceMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41298548
PMCPMC12658000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.