ArticleScientific reports2025
Hybrid quantum/classical docking of covalent and non-covalent ligands with Attracting Cavities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MBind: A Web-Based Platform for Metalloprotein and Nonmetalloprotein Docking with Optional ML Docking Integration.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Attracting Cavities 3.0: faster and more versatile molecular docking for the SwissDock webserver.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Systematic evaluation of computational tools to predict the effects of mutations on protein-ligand binding affinity in the absence of experimental structures.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ligand-protein docking aims to predict how a ligand binds to a biological macromolecule and is a fundamental technique in structure-based computer-aided drug design. However, accurately modeling covalent binding, metal coordination, and polarization effects remains challenging for classical docking algorithms. Here, we present an extension of our Attracting Cavities docking algorithm that enables hybrid quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) calculations at various levels of theory. To evaluate its performance, we benchmarked the method on three diverse datasets covering non-covalent drug-target complexes, covalent complexes, and hemoprotein complexes, using both semi-empirical and density functional theory approaches. The results demonstrate that QM/MM docking is especially advantageous for metal-binding complexes, where the fast semi-empirical PM7 method yields a significant improvement over classical docking. When describing the active site residues at the density functional theory level, dispersion corrections are crucial for meaningful energies. Overall, the QM/MM method outperforms the classical approach for metalloproteins, performs comparably for covalent complexes, and shows slightly lower success rates for non-covalent complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.