Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41298540›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Experimental analysis of elevated temperature and soiling loss on the rooftop PV modules performance under composite climatic conditions.

Deepak Yadav, Satish Kumar Yadav, Vishnu Varma, Sidra Khatoon, Jyotsna Singh, Rajendra Bahadur Singh, S M Mozammil Hasnain, Prabhu Paramasivam, Mitiku Adare Tufa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Deepak YadavDepartment of Physics, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, U.P., India.
Satish Kumar YadavInstitute of New and Renewable Energy, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, U.P., India.
Vishnu VarmaGreenko Group, Hyderabad, 500081, Telangana, India.
Sidra KhatoonDepartment of Physics, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, U.P., India.
Jyotsna SinghDepartment of Physics, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, U.P., India.
Rajendra Bahadur SinghDepartment of Physics, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, U.P., India.
S M Mozammil HasnainMarwadi University Research Centre, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Marwadi University, Rajkot, 360003, Gujarat, India.
Prabhu ParamasivamCentre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, 140401, Punjab, India.
Mitiku Adare TufaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Salale University, Salale, Fiche, 245, Ethiopia. mitikuadare@slu.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On-field performance of a solar PV plant completely relies on solar radiation intensity and its availability. During operation, the output of a solar PV module varies from its rated capacity due to weather parameters such as ambient temperature, humidity, rainfall, wind, and dust. The primary objective of the study is to experimentally evaluate the combined effect of elevated temperature, soiling, and wind-driven convective cooling on rooftop PV performance under composite climatic conditions of North India, which are less explored compared to arid or temperate regions. During the investigation, the effects of elevated operating temperature, daily soiling accumulation, and wind-driven convective cooling on a 500 Wp rooftop PV setup monitored at five-minute intervals throughout June. The results reveal that elevated cell temperatures peaking at 64.0 °C caused an average daily efficiency reduction of 12.0%, with a 9.6% decline in output power directly attributable to temperature effects. Maximum soiling loss was calculated about 0.47% per day with a total monthly loss of 10.2% with some occasional showers cleaning the module by the end of the month. Convective heat loss from the roof mounted PV array was found to be 16.19% higher than a simulated ground-mounted system due to elevated wind exposure, contributing to a 2.27% improvement in energy yield. This study is based on a pilot-scale rooftop installation monitored for a single month. While results were normalized for broader applicability, the scope remains limited, and findings should be interpreted accordingly. The findings highlight that rooftop PV system is simultaneously affected by thermal and soiling effects, and both require explicit consideration at the design stage. Enhanced wind exposure can provide a natural and maintenance-free cooling benefit over ground-mounted systems. Site-specific cleaning schedules are essential to prevent daily dust accumulation.

Indexed as

Ambient temperatureCell temperatureEfficiencySoilingSolar PV system

Identifiers

PMID41298540
PMCPMC12658225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.