Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41298398›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Ultrablack wool textiles inspired by hierarchical avian structure.

Hansadi Jayamaha, Kyuin Park, Larissa M Shepherd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Polydopamine-Wool Textiles for Sustainable Interfacial Solar Vapor Generation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hansadi Jayamaha *Department of Human Centered Design, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9019-3242
Kyuin Park *Department of Human Centered Design, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4110-6544
Larissa M ShepherdDepartment of Human Centered Design, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. larissa.shepherd@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6089-235X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildlife often uses a combination of colors in their skin, scales, and feathers to both attract mates and avoid predators. Some animals express an extreme level of black color, called "ultrablack" with reflectance <0.5%. The various nano/microstructures that produce ultrablack have been studied and replicated synthetically. These synthetic ultrablack materials, however, use highly advanced and costly techniques, toxic substances, and lack the flexibility and biocompatibility that are often desired in real-world textile applications. Here we show that a conventional natural fabric can be transformed into an ultrablack one with a biocompatible dye and a surface modification to create nanofibrils. The ultrablack wool fabrics we report have an average total reflectance of 0.13% (λ = 400-700 nm) and represent the darkest fabrics currently reported. Unlike commercially available ultrablack fabrics, the ultrablack wool developed in this study remains breathable and conformable. Furthermore, it exhibits wide-angle ultrablack performance, maintaining a symmetric (angle-independent) optical response across a 120° angular span. Environmental and mechanical tests also prove the material's resilience, showing the retention of its natural fabric characteristics alongside its ultrablack properties. To demonstrate the manufacturability in the textile industry, we present multiple parameter sets for plasma etching to achieve the ultrablack effect.

Indexed as

BirdsTextilesWoolWool FiberAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsColorBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID41298398
PMCPMC12657505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.