Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41298371›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Continuous indices to assess the phenotypic spectrum of kidney transplant rejection.

Thibaut Vaulet, Priyanka Koshy, Karolien Wellekens, Olivier Aubert, Charlotte Bottomley, Jasper Callemeyn, Evert Cleenders, Maarten Coemans, Lynn Cornell, Aiko P J de Vries and 21 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Findings and significance of early follow-up biopsies after treatment of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  8. Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA as a Non-Invasive Readout of Activity Across the Rejection Continuum.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The Top 12 Most Impactful Papers in Clinical Transplantation in 2025: TI Editors' Choice.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Thibaut VauletNephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1226-3153
Priyanka KoshyNephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2313-5122
Karolien WellekensNephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Olivier AubertUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm UMR1151, Necker Enfants Malades Institute (INEM), Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6284-3757
Charlotte BottomleyDepartment of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8140-9303
Jasper CallemeynNephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Evert CleendersNephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Maarten CoemansNephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8442-3673
Lynn CornellDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine and Department of Medicine at the University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Aiko P J de VriesDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9284-3595
Gillian DivardUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970 PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3450-0033
Marie-Paule EmondsHistocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2653-8656
Sandrine FlorquinAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Dept. of Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark HaasDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Philip F HalloranDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Jesper KersDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2418-5279
Dirk KuypersNephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thangamani MuthukumarDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Angelica PagliazziNephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Steven SalvatoreDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Olivier ThaunatCIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, Lyon, France.
Surya V SeshanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Elisabet Van LoonNephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas VanhoutteNephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7144-1872
Georg A BöhmigDivision of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7600-912X
Friedrich A von Samson-HimmelstjernaDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4492-696X
Michelle WillicombeDepartment of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Aravind CherukuriThomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8649-2901
Alexandre LoupyUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U970 PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France.
Candice RoufosseDepartment of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6490-4290
Maarten NaesensNephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. maarten.naesens@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-0792

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Research Foundation Flanders) 11P1524N, 1S93023N, 12D6423N, 1143919N, 1196119N, 1844024N, G038024NOnderzoeksraad, KU Leuven (Research Council, KU Leuven) C2M/24/057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Banff classification for kidney transplant pathology dichotomizes the rejection continuum into distinct diagnostic categories, introducing artificial cutoff points and threshold effects. To better reflect the underlying disease spectrum, in this cohort study of 19,500 biopsies from 8873 patients across 10 centers worldwide, we developed two indices for quantifying antibody-mediated rejection/microvascular inflammation and T-cell-mediated rejection/tubulointerstitial inflammation from histological lesion scores and calculated indices for overall activity and chronicity. These indices demonstrate excellent discrimination for the main diagnostic categories of rejection (AUCs from 0.95 to 0.99), with consistent performance across derivation and validation datasets. These indices strictly confine intermediate phenotypes to low index values and are associated to graft failure even within the diagnostic categories, thus reflecting the underlying rejection continuum. In this work, we demonstrate that four continuous indices provide implementable and interpretable global evaluation of kidney transplant histology that align with the continuous nature of the rejection process regardless of the underlying disease cause.

Indexed as

Graft RejectionKidney TransplantationAdultBiopsyCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeT-Lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID41298371
PMCPMC12658238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.