ArticleNature communications2025
Genomic GC bias correction improves species abundance estimation from metagenomic data.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic GC bias correction improves species abundance estimation from metagenomic data.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metagenomic sequencing measures the species composition of microbial communities and has revealed the crucial role of microbiomes in the etiology of a range of diseases such as colorectal cancer. Quantitative comparisons of microbial communities are, however, affected by GC-content-dependent biases. Here, we present GuaCAMOLE, a computational method to detect and remove GC bias from metagenomic sequencing data. The algorithm relies on comparisons between individual species in a single sample to estimate the sequencing efficiency at levels of GC content, and outputs unbiased species abundances. GuaCAMOLE thus works regardless of the specific amount or direction of GC-bias present in the data and does not rely on calibration experiments or multiple samples. Applying our algorithm to 3435 gut microbiomes of colorectal cancer patients from 33 individual studies reveals that the type and severity of GC bias vary considerably between studies. In many studies, we observe a clear bias against GC-poor species in the abundances reported by existing methods. GuaCAMOLE successfully removes this bias and corrects the abundance of clinically relevant GC-poor species such as F. nucleatum (28% GC) by up to a factor of two. GuaCAMOLE thus contributes to a better quantitative understanding of microbial communities by improving the accuracy and comparability of species abundances across experimental setups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.