Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41298303›Full record

ReviewACR open rheumatology2025

Importance and Potential of Rare Disease Research in Pediatric Rheumatology and Beyond: Pushing Frontiers.

Christian M Hedrich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACR open rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christian M HedrichDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool and Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1295-6179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although individually occurring in less than 1 in 2,000 people, cumulatively, more than 7,000 rare diseases affect approximately 6% of the population worldwide. Children and young people are disproportionally challenged in number and severity, which may be explained by the large proportion of genetic conditions among rare diseases (70%-80%). Indeed, an estimated 30% of children with rare diseases do not survive past their fifth birthday. Because rare diseases are frequently missed or diagnosed with a delay of several years and <5% of rare diseases have a licensed treatment, the impact of rare diseases on the indivual affected (independent of age) and wider society is significant. To address these challenges sufficiently, rare disease expert centers combining research activity with patient care are needed to develop diagnostic tests, prognostic tools, and new treatments. This expert-driven approach promises expedited diagnosis and efficacious treatment and care. Although restricted by chronic underfunding, rare disease research keeps delivering new exciting treatment options and technologies, some of which have revolutionized care not only in niche areas of medicine but also common diseases (the use of interleukin-1 blockers in gout or COVID-19-associated hyperinflammation, etc). However, rare disease research and care will only be successful in collaborative, mutidisciplinary and multiprofessional teams that involve patients and families as equal partners and span across institutional and national borders. Lastly, the use of state-of-the-art computational approaches to share knowledge and associate molecular with clinical phenotypes, treatment responses, and disease outcomes will amplify our ability to serve patients and the society.

Identifiers

PMID41298303
PMCPMC12657117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.