ArticleBMJ open2025
Culturally tailored interventions in adults with obesity: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and qualitative evidence synthesis.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionObesity disproportionately affects ethnic minority populations due to structural inequalities, such as limited access to healthy food, inadequate healthcare and systemic racism. Universal weight management programmes often fail to meet the unique needs of ethnic minority populations. These universal interventions may lead to lower engagement and poorer health outcomes compared with those observed in non-minoritised ethnic groups. This systematic review will examine the impact of culturally tailored interventions to treat and manage obesity in adult ethnic minority populations on weight- and health-related outcomes (meta-analysis) and patient experience (qualitative evidence synthesis). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines will be followed. Interventions of interest will include standalone or multicomponent behavioural interventions with culturally tailored elements of design or delivery. These will be compared against standard weight management interventions or usual care in adults from ethnic minority populations living with obesity. The primary outcome is the mean percentage weight (kg) change between pre-post interventions. A search of databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science) was conducted in February 2025. Eligible studies include randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental (non-randomised trials, pre-post interventions) and qualitative research. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Narrative synthesis will be performed according to the synthesis without meta-analysis guidelines. For eligible RCTs, a random-effects meta-analysis will calculate pooled effect sizes between pre-post intervention using standardised mean differences, with additional sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Qualitative evidence synthesis will be performed using semi-automated text analytics (unsupervised machine learning) and inductive thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, conference presentations, professional organisations and patient and public networks. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42025636750.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.