ArticleBMJ open2025
Protocol for a study comparing the efficacy of hysterectomy in patients with enlarged uterus via TU-LESS and vNOTES: a single-blind, prospective randomised clinical trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06663553 (Protocol for a Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Protocol for a Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery (TU-LESS) and Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) in Hysterectomy Performed on Patients With Enlarged Uterus: A Prospective Single-blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMinimally invasive techniques have been widely adopted for hysterectomy, including Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery (TU-LESS) and Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES). However, their efficacy in patients with an enlarged uterus (≥280 g) remains not fully illustrated due to surgical complexity. We will compare the perioperative outcomes and recovery profiles of TU-LESS and vNOTES of this population in this study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial will take place in West China Second University Hospital. A total of 210 women with benign or precancerous uterine enlargement undergoing total hysterectomy (±salpingectomy/adnexectomy) will be randomised (1:1) to TU-LESS or vNOTES. The trial will span 2 years, including a follow-up of half a year. The primary outcomes will be the proportions achieving the indices of enhanced recovery after surgery respectively, including liquid diet tolerance, flatus passage, unassisted urination and mobility, during 24 hours after surgery and discharge within 2 days. Secondary outcomes include pain scores, operative duration, blood loss, complications, scar quality, analgesic use and pelvic/sexual function. Data collection occurs at baseline, perioperatively and 3/6 months postoperatively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital (2023 medical scientific research for ethical approval No.321). Written informed consent will be collected from all participants. Results will be shared through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06663553.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.