ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Mapping Charge Interactions in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy for probing conformations, dynamics, and interactions in disordered protein regions.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026Review
- A Sequence-Specific Theory for Charge-Regulating IDPs.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are often rich in charged residues, and electrostatic interactions have a pronounced effect on their conformational distributions, interactions and functions. However, attaining quantitative understanding of electrostatics is challenging because of the sequence-specific arrangement of charges in the chain, the long-range nature of electrostatic interactions, charge screening, and the condensation of counterions-effects that all need to be taken into account self-consistently. Here, analytically tractable quantitative models are developed to predict ensemble average distances between any pair of residues in IDPs as a function of sequence and salt concentration, explicitly considering charge patterning. These models are tested systematically against extensive single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) data mapping intrachain distances for a range of charged IDPs with different sequence compositions, as a function of salt concentration, and with different labeling positions and fluorophores. The resulting polymer model with a minimal set of adjustable parameters accounts for counterion condensation, the resulting effective charges, as well as dipolar interactions, and can be used to predict detailed intrachain distance maps between all residues. Analytical models of this kind offer a valuable complement to simulations and can provide fundamental insight into the interactions underlying the conformational distributions of IDPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.