Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41297951›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2025

Using behavioural science to design public health social media campaigns.

Simon Williams, Karin Stein, Aleksandra Kuzmanovic, Mohamed Gulaid, Lisa Menning, Elena Altieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simon WilliamsBehavioural Insights Unit, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland williamssi@who.int.ORCID 0000-0003-2854-9946
Karin SteinBehavioural Insights Unit, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Aleksandra KuzmanovicDepartment of Communications, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mohamed GulaidDepartment of Communications, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0002-5212-5414
Lisa MenningDepartment of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Elena AltieriBehavioural Insights Unit, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communicating health risks via social media is an important objective for public health organisations. Behavioural science theoretical constructs can help enhance the design, implementation and evaluation of social media campaigns. In this Practice article, we document the WHO's experience in developing social media messaging using gist and verbatim constructs to influence risk perceptions related to measles and intentions related to measles vaccination. We share our experience to support other public health communication practitioners who may seek to incorporate behavioural science into their social media campaigns to achieve desired shifts in health-related attitudes and intentions in target audiences.

Indexed as

Behavioral SciencesHealth PromotionPublic HealthSocial MediaHumansMeaslesGlobal HealthImmunisationPrevention strategiesPublic HealthVaccines

Identifiers

PMID41297951
PMCPMC12359559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.