ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2026
A Retrospective Study of 116 Multiple Sclerosis Patients with Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment in a Single Institution in Japan.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The global prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) is increasing worldwide. Although many disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have been approved, they can cause serious adverse events, including infections. Dimethyl fumarate (DMF), an immunomodulator, has a favorable safety profile. In this era of personalized therapy, it is important to select an appropriate DMT for individual patients. This study evaluated DMF treatment outcomes in Japanese patients with MS. Methods The medical records of Japanese patients with MS treated with DMF at a single institution between January 6, 2013, and October 31, 2022, were reviewed retrospectively. The reasons for discontinuation of DMF, switching from other DMTs to DMF, transition of DMF to other medications, absolute lymphocyte count, disease activity assessment, comparison of DMF continuation versus discontinuation, and factors associated with the annualized relapse rate during DMF use were assessed. Results Of the 116 DMF-treated patients, DMF treatment was continued to prevent relapse recurrence in 54.7% of RRMS (n=86) and 23.3% of SPMS (n=30) patients. The main reasons for not continuing DMF treatment included failure to prevent relapse or disease progression (63% of patients who did not continue DMF). A lower annual recurrence rate prior to DMF initiation, lower Expanded Disability Status Scale score, shorter duration from disease onset to DMF initiation, fewer relapse recurrences during DMF therapy, and diagnosis of RRMS were associated with DMF continuation. Conclusion Continuous monitoring is essential after initiating DMF treatment because patients may require transition to other therapies. Overall, 47% of the MS patients were effectively managed with DMF, with favorable outcomes observed in 54.7% of the RRMS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.