ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Characteristics of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients on Factor-Xa Inhibitors: Japan Stroke Data Bank.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients Receiving Factor Xa Inhibitors: Challenges and Perspectives.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Since andexanet alfa was approved in May 2022 in Japan, improvement in clinical outcomes of patients with intracranial hemorrhage while on factor Xa inhibitors (FXaIs) is expected. To assess real-world outcomes before approval, this study investigated the clinical outcomes in Japan prior to 2022. Methods Patients who developed intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and were admitted within 24 h of their last known well time or onset of symptoms between January 2016 and December 2021 were included. Data were obtained from the Japan Stroke Data Bank, a nationwide multicenter prospective registry. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality and favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at discharge). Results A total of 859 patients (rivaroxaban, n=227; apixaban, n=355; edoxaban, n=277) with ICH (ICH: n=822, age 79±9 years, 38.6% female; SAH: n=37, age 79±10, 75.7% female) were investigated. On admission, the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score in ICH patients was 13 [interquartile range (IQR): 6-24], and the median Glasgow Coma Scale score in patients with SAH was 11 (IQR: 6-14). During the in-hospital period [20 (IQR: 11-37) days], 167 patients with ICH (20.3%) and 14 patients with SAH (37.8%) died in hospital; 135 patients with ICH (16.4%) and 5 patients with SAH (13.5%) achieved a favorable outcome. Conclusion This study presents the clinical outcomes prior to the approval of andexanet alfa. Further studies are needed to evaluate post-approval outcome changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.