Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41297912›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of laboratory hematology2026

ICSH Recommendations for Monocyte Cell Lineage Morphologic Identification, Nomenclature Harmonization, and Utilization as a Biomarker.

Gina Zini, Yoon Hwan Chang, Giuseppe d'Onofrio, John Frater, Ulrich Germing, Anna Merino, Olga Pozdnyakova, David Ross, Claudio Romulo Siqueira Filho, Akiyoshi Takami and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of laboratory hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gina ZiniUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-294X
Yoon Hwan ChangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Giuseppe d'OnofrioUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
John FraterDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4614-681X
Ulrich GermingDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6027-6388
Anna MerinoCore Laboratory, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Olga PozdnyakovaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
David RossHaematology Directorate, SA Pathology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Claudio Romulo Siqueira FilhoCatholic University São Camilo in São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Akiyoshi TakamiDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan.
Erber WendyPathWest Laboratory Medicine, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monocytes are key components of the Mononuclear Phagocyte System, crucial in immune defense, inflammation, and tissue repair. Accurate identification and classification of monocyte lineage cells are essential for diagnosing both reactive and clonal hematologic disorders. However, morphological criteria and nomenclature inconsistencies have hindered reproducibility, particularly with the rise of automated and AI-driven diagnostic tools. The International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) Monocyte Working Group (MWG) was convened to establish standardized morphological definitions, harmonize nomenclature for monocytes and their precursors, and evaluate their clinical utility as biomarkers. Data were collected from global laboratories, combined with an extensive literature review and consensus feedback from the ICSH General Assembly. The MWG proposes a three-category morphological classification: blasts and blast equivalents (monoblasts and promonocytes), immature monocytes, and mature monocytes. The recommendations reaffirm the importance of morphological analysis, cytochemical staining, and flow cytometry for accurate diagnosis. Emerging automated parameters, such as monocyte distribution width (MDW), and ratios like lymphocyte/monocyte (LMR) and neutrophil/monocyte (NMR), are also recognized as valuable adjunctive biomarkers. Cytogenetic and molecular results may also impact the utilization of monocytes as a biomarker. These harmonized recommendations aim to improve diagnostic accuracy, support the development of machine learning tools, and facilitate consistent reporting across laboratories worldwide.

Indexed as

Cell LineageMonocytesTerminology as TopicBiomarkersFlow CytometryHumansBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID41297912
PMCPMC12809381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.