ReviewInternational journal of laboratory hematology2026
ICSH Recommendations for Monocyte Cell Lineage Morphologic Identification, Nomenclature Harmonization, and Utilization as a Biomarker.
Review in International journal of laboratory hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of the Performance of Siemens Scopio Digital Morphology on Bone Marrow Aspirates in Onco-Hematology.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Article
- How to Interpret the Complete Blood Count in Daily Practice: A Practical Framework for Clinical Decision-making.JMA journal · 2026Review
- Ultrastructural Organization of Epididymis in the Cattle Egret (Bubulcus ibis) During Breeding Season.Anatomia, histologia, embryologia · 2026Article
- An Update on the Activities of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, 2026.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning Model for IMMP-Based Residual Disease Monitoring in AML with Monocytic Differentiation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- ICSH Recommendations for Monocyte Cell Lineage Morphologic Identification, Nomenclature Harmonization, and Utilization as a Biomarker.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monocytes are key components of the Mononuclear Phagocyte System, crucial in immune defense, inflammation, and tissue repair. Accurate identification and classification of monocyte lineage cells are essential for diagnosing both reactive and clonal hematologic disorders. However, morphological criteria and nomenclature inconsistencies have hindered reproducibility, particularly with the rise of automated and AI-driven diagnostic tools. The International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) Monocyte Working Group (MWG) was convened to establish standardized morphological definitions, harmonize nomenclature for monocytes and their precursors, and evaluate their clinical utility as biomarkers. Data were collected from global laboratories, combined with an extensive literature review and consensus feedback from the ICSH General Assembly. The MWG proposes a three-category morphological classification: blasts and blast equivalents (monoblasts and promonocytes), immature monocytes, and mature monocytes. The recommendations reaffirm the importance of morphological analysis, cytochemical staining, and flow cytometry for accurate diagnosis. Emerging automated parameters, such as monocyte distribution width (MDW), and ratios like lymphocyte/monocyte (LMR) and neutrophil/monocyte (NMR), are also recognized as valuable adjunctive biomarkers. Cytogenetic and molecular results may also impact the utilization of monocytes as a biomarker. These harmonized recommendations aim to improve diagnostic accuracy, support the development of machine learning tools, and facilitate consistent reporting across laboratories worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.