Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41297788›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2026

Eravacycline and omadacycline Rescue multidrug-resistant Elizabethkingia anophelis: Triple-Model evaluation across in Vitro, Galleria mellonella, and murine bacteremia systems.

Shaohua Hu, Li Jiang, Hao Xu, Xiaohua Meng, Duo Zhang, Di Zhou, Yonghong Xiao, Beiwen Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shaohua HuState Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; Yuhang Institute of Medical Science Innovation and Transformation, Hangzhou, China.
Li JiangLaboratory of Animal Research Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Hao XuState Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; Yuhang Institute of Medical Science Innovation and Transformation, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaohua MengState Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; Yuhang Institute of Medical Science Innovation and Transformation, Hangzhou, China.
Duo ZhangThe School of Basic Medicine, Beihua University, Jilin, China.
Di ZhouThe School of Basic Medicine, Beihua University, Jilin, China.
Yonghong XiaoState Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; Yuhang Institute of Medical Science Innovation and Transformation, Hangzhou, China; Department of Structure and Morphology, Jinan Microecological Biomedicine Shandong Laboratory, Jinan, China; Research Units of Infectious Diseases and Microecology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. Electronic address: xiaoyonghong@zju.edu.cn.
Beiwen ZhengState Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; Yuhang Institute of Medical Science Innovation and Transformation, Hangzhou, China; Department of Structure and Morphology, Jinan Microecological Biomedicine Shandong Laboratory, Jinan, China; Research Units of Infectious Diseases and Microecology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. Electronic address: zhengbw@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElizabethkingia anophelis has emerged as a formidable pathogen causing severe, life-threatening human infections. Treatment remains challenging due to its intrinsic multidrug resistance. OBJECTIVES AND

methodsThis study presents the first evaluation of eravacycline and omadacycline efficacy against E. anophelis in vitro and in vivo. Susceptibility testing of 197 clinical isolates employed broth microdilution. Galleria mellonella larval infection and murine bacteremia models assessed therapeutic efficacy.

resultsMinimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) analyses demonstrated potent in vitro activity against clinical isolates, with MICs as low as 0.06 mg/L and 0.125 mg/L, respectively. In the G. mellonella model, both agents significantly delayed larval mortality (P < 0.01) and improved health indices. Murine studies showed substantial reductions in bacterial burden versus saline controls, alongside significant anti-inflammatory and organ-protective effects. Eravacycline achieved complete bacterial eradication in hepatic, splenic, and pulmonary tissues.

conclusionThese findings substantiate the robust antimicrobial efficacy of eravacycline and omadacycline against E. anophelis, offering valuable insights for optimizing clinical management. They provide compelling proof-of-concept that fluorocyclines eradicate multidrug-resistant E. anophelis in vitro and in vivo, strongly supporting clinical trial investigation.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFlavobacteriaceaeFlavobacteriaceae InfectionsTetracyclinesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansLarvaMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMothsAnti-Bacterial AgentseravacyclineomadacyclineTetracyclinesAntimicrobial efficacyBlood infectionElizabethkingia anophelisEravacyclineOmadacycline

Identifiers

PMID41297788
PMCPMC13453614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.