ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2025
Ultrasonic frequency and intensity dependence in β
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amyloid fibrils are aberrant proteinaceous aggregates involved in several intractable diseases called amyloidosis. Detecting fragments of amyloid fibrils, so-called seeds, in human biofluids is a promising approach for their early-stage diagnosis. Ultrasonication of amyloidogenic protein solutions has the potential to enhance the detection sensitivity of amyloid seeds in an accelerated manner through the effects of ultrasonic cavitation. However, the effects of acoustic frequency and intensity on ultrasonic seed detection have not been investigated. In this study, we explore the optimized acoustic conditions for rapid and sensitive amyloid-seed detection and sonochemical mechanisms behind it. Our results show that maximum detection performance is achieved at moderate acoustic intensities with frequencies below 109 kHz, where the balance between ultrasonic enhancement of nucleation and fragmentation pathways of amyloid formation is suitable for the detection of amyloid seeds. Under these conditions, the detection time for amyloid seeds is reduced fivefold while achieving detection sensitivity of 1 pM. We further find that excessively high-intensity ultrasonication is likely to cause fragmentation of protein monomers into smaller peptides at lower frequencies, while that at frequencies above 200 kHz introduces reactive radical species, hindering the ultrasonic seed detection assay. These results highlight the critical role of optimizing acoustic parameters for the application of ultrasonication in the amyloid-seed detection, offering a pathway for rapid diagnostic assays for amyloidosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.