Trial reportESMO open2025
Safety and efficacy of tiragolumab, atezolizumab and chemotherapy for early-stage or PD-L1-positive advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a phase Ib study.
Trial report in ESMO open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04584112 (A Phase Ib, Open-Label, Multicohort Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Tiragolumab in Combination With Atezolizumab and Chemotherapy in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase Ib, Open-Label, Multicohort Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Tiragolumab in Combination With Atezolizumab and Chemotherapy in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathological Complete Response to Nab-Paclitaxel-Containing Neoadjuvant Regimens in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Navigating a Rapidly Evolving Therapeutic Landscape.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Methionine restriction in cancer: a dietary insight for therapy.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the management of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) but outcomes could be improved further. We explored combining the T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domains (TIGIT) inhibitor tiragolumab with atezolizumab-containing regimens for patients with early-stage or advanced TNBC. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis multinational open-label phase Ib study included two cohorts. In cohort A [programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced TNBC], patients received first-line tiragolumab with atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate. In cohort B (early-stage TNBC, irrespective of PD-L1 status), patients were randomised to receive tiragolumab, atezolizumab and sequential taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant therapy with (arm A) or without (arm B) carboplatin. The primary objective was to evaluate safety in arm A versus arm B.
resultsBetween September 2020 and October 2021, 83 patients were enrolled from 24 sites in eight countries. In cohort A (n = 41), the confirmed objective response rate was 54% [95% confidence interval (CI) 37% to 69%], median duration of response in 22 responding patients was 7.2 months (95% CI 4.9-13.1 months), median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% CI 5.4-9.0 months) and median overall survival was 24.6 months (95% CI 14.7 months-not estimable). Five patients (12%) discontinued tiragolumab for adverse events. In cohort B (n = 42), carboplatin was associated with more haematological effects but no increase in pathologic complete response rate [arm A: 46% (95% CI 24% to 68%); arm B: 55% (95% CI 32% to 77%)]. Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 23% and 20% of patients in arms A and B, respectively.
conclusionsThe activity of tiragolumab-containing regimens appeared similar to that of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in randomised phase III trials in early-stage and advanced TNBC. The safety profile of all three regimens was consistent with previous experience of similar regimens in other tumour types and with symptoms of the underlying disease. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04584112.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.