Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41297043›Full record

ReviewCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Extent and Mitigation of Financial Toxicity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Nabil E Omar, Hazem Elewa, Kareem A El-Fass, Dario Trapani, Said Dermime, Daoud Al-Badriyeh, Dina Abushanab, Anas Hamad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nabil E OmarPharmacy Department, National Centre for Cancer Care and Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-8291-7987
Hazem ElewaCollege of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Kareem A El-FassSyreon Middle East, Alexanderia, Egypt.
Dario TrapaniEuropean Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Said DermimeTranslational Cancer Research Facility, National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Daoud Al-BadriyehCollege of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Dina AbushanabDrug Information Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Anas HamadPharmacy Department, National Centre for Cancer Care and Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a serious condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Over the past few decades, however, this has drastically changed, primarily attributed to the development of new treatments, including tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study aims to highlight the financial toxicity (FT) of advanced HCC treatments, across diverse healthcare systems and particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We also aim to explore potential solutions to improve access to life-saving therapies such as ICIs. We conducted an exploratory targeted review of the current literature focusing on therapeutic advancements, their accessibility, and innovative strategies to overcome FT. The review particularly addresses barriers faced in LMICs and examines initiatives that could optimize ICI availability. Findings suggest that FT significantly limits access to ICIs globally, with heightened impact in resource-limited settings and increasingly recognized in high-income countries as well. This challenge is particularly severe in LMICs, where the high incidence of HCC is compounded by the unaffordability of effective treatments, creating a significant barrier to care. Key strategies to mitigate this include cost-saving measures such as dose rounding, vial sharing, lower dosage regimens, extended dosing intervals, and shorter treatment durations. Evidence from emerging studies, predominantly in non-HCC malignancies, suggests these measures may be tolerated without unexpected safety signals. However, HCC-specific prospective data remain limited, and these approaches are entirely off-label requiring further research. Addressing financial barriers to ICI access is essential for improving outcomes in advanced HCC, globally and particularly in LMICs. Global adoption of cost-saving strategies could enhance equitable access to innovative treatments, warranting further research and collaboration among stakeholders from both high- and low-income nations.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLiver NeoplasmsDeveloping CountriesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsfinancial toxicityhepatocellular carcinomaimmune checkpoint inhibitorslow- and middle-income countries

Identifiers

PMID41297043
PMCPMC12657796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.