Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41296867›Full record

ArticleScience advances2025

View-invariant representations in ancestral cortex.

Milan Becker, Nimrod Leberstein, Mark Shein-Idelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Milan BeckerSchool of Neurobiology, Biochemistry, and Biophysics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0009-0000-4710-6150
Nimrod LebersteinSchool of Neurobiology, Biochemistry, and Biophysics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Mark Shein-IdelsonSchool of Neurobiology, Biochemistry, and Biophysics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8132-2826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multilayered, thalamorecipient visual cortex emerged ~320 million years ago in stem amniotes. Despite its importance for understanding the evolution of cortical computation, its function remains unknown. We recorded visually evoked responses in the dorsal cortex of behaving turtles, considered a mammalian neocortex homolog. Using a spatial oddball paradigm, we found tuning to stimuli in deviant positions alongside adaptation to standard positions within the visual field. Eye tracking demonstrated that responses remained spatially selective despite gaze shifts altering retinal stimulus position. Thus, the turtle cortex encodes unexpected visual stimuli using computations invariant to retinal position, a property previously observed only in higher mammalian cortices. These results indicate that invariance computations preceded the evolution of local filtering computations in mammalian primary cortices, pointing to a previously unidentified function for ancestral cortices. They also challenge hierarchical models of invariance computations, which assume that invariance is built from low-level features across multiple processing steps.

Indexed as

Visual CortexVisual PerceptionAnimalsBiological EvolutionEvoked Potentials, VisualPhotic StimulationTurtlesVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID41296867
PMCPMC12652236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.