Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41296860›Full record

ArticleScience advances2025

Animal tracking with particle algorithms informs protected area design.

Edward Lavender, Andreas Scheidegger, Carlo Albert, Stanisław W Biber, Jakob Brodersen, Dmitry Aleynik, Georgina Cole, Jane Dodd, Peter J Wright, Janine Illian and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Edward LavenderDepartment of Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling, Eawag Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8040-7489
Andreas ScheideggerDepartment of Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling, Eawag Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2575-2172
Carlo AlbertDepartment of Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling, Eawag Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9160-9601
Stanisław W BiberSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5157-2904
Jakob BrodersenDepartment of Fish Ecology and Evolution, Eawag Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Kastanienbaum, Luzern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2060-6379
Dmitry AleynikScottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Argyll and Bute, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2066-1960
Georgina ColeRoyal Zoological Society of Scotland, Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0005-5012-6853
Jane DoddNatureScot, Oban, Argyll and Bute, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0953-5998
Peter J WrightMarine Scotland Science, Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8402-5795
Janine IllianSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6130-2796
Mark JamesScottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom.
Sophie SmoutScottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5125-9827
James ThorburnSchool of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4392-1737
Helen MoorDepartment of Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling, Eawag Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1340-2039

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal movements affect their exposure to threats and the efficacy of conservation measures, such as marine protected areas (MPAs). However, many species' movements are difficult to reconstruct from available datasets, hampering conservation efforts. This is especially the case for aquatic species that rarely surface, for which data are often limited to observations from acoustic telemetry (detections) and ancillary sensors. Here, we pioneer the use of state-of-the-art particle algorithms to model movements, integrate datasets, and assess MPA design, leveraging a case study of a Critically Endangered elasmobranch. Our algorithms led to 5-fold improvements in space-use maps and 30-fold improvements in residency estimates compared to prevailing methods. By integrating tracking datasets, we were uniquely able to examine movements beyond acoustic receivers, MPA-scale residency, and specific habitats beyond protected areas that warrant protection. This work reveals a modeling framework that enhances the conservation value of acoustic telemetry, supporting analyses of MPA efficacy worldwide.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsEcosystemEndangered SpeciesTelemetry

Identifiers

PMID41296860
PMCPMC12652237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.