Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41296795›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Characteristics of individuals who received a complete, 2-dose mpox vaccine regimen as part of the public health response to the mpox epidemic in Ontario, Canada.

Ramandip Grewal, Cindy Lau, Jeffrey C Kwong, Ann N Burchell, Lindsay Friedman, Christine Navarro, Evaezi Okpokoro, Darrell H S Tan, Austin Zygmunt, Li Bai and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ramandip GrewalCentre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1922-2442
Cindy LauPopulations and Public Health, ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jeffrey C KwongCentre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ann N BurchellDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lindsay FriedmanCommunicable Disease Control, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4291-4719
Christine NavarroCentre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Evaezi OkpokoroInternational Research Centre of Excellence, Institute of Human Virology Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3219-5995
Darrell H S TanInstitute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3069-2875
Austin ZygmuntCommunicable Disease Control, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4219-6887
Li BaiPopulations and Public Health, ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sharmistha MishraDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8492-5470
Sarah A BuchanCentre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN) Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In May 2022, an outbreak of mpox emerged in Canada. In June 2022, the province of Ontario began offering first doses of a 2-dose regimen of Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavaria Nordic (MVA-BN) to those at high risk of exposure. Second doses became available in September 2022. To help increase dose 2 access and uptake, we sought to understand how individuals who received 2 doses differed from those who received only 1 dose. We conducted a cross-sectional study using population-level data among individuals who received ≥1 dose of MVA-BN between June 6, 2022 and October 31, 2023 in Ontario. We used age-adjusted Poisson regression to examine the association between demographic, social, and economic characteristics; co-morbidities; and proxies for sexual exposure (e.g., bacterial sexually transmitted infection [STI] diagnoses) and proxies for healthcare engagement (e.g., syphilis testing, past receipt of other vaccines) with MVA-BN dose 2 receipt. Among 33,012 individuals with ≥1 MVA-BN dose, 38.2% (12,620) received 2 doses. Receipt of dose 2 versus only dose 1 was associated with region (e.g., higher in Ottawa compared with Toronto [prevalence ratio, PR = 1.08, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.06-1.09]); syphilis testing (≥4 tests PR = 1.12, 95%CI 1.11-1.14) or receiving a COVID-19, influenza, or other vaccine (PR = 1.12, 95%CI 1.11-1.14) in the year before dose 1; and syphilis testing (≥4 tests PR = 1.19, 95%CI 1.18-1.20) or bacterial STI diagnoses >3 months after dose 1 (≥4 diagnoses PR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.08). Refugees were less likely to get dose 2 versus Canadian-born individuals or long-term immigrants (PR = 0.93, 95%CI 0.91-0.95).Our findings suggest lower healthcare access and/or engagement may play a role in limiting dose 2 receipt in Ontario. Public messaging around availability and eligibility of second doses, tailored strategies for eligible refugees, increased access outside healthcare venues, and adopting promotion strategies from regions with high uptake, may help increase dose 2 coverage.

Identifiers

PMID41296795
PMCPMC12654912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.