Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41296770›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2026

Integrating systems and implementation science in modeling and evaluating complex health interventions: methodological reflections from service delivery redesign in Kakamega, Kenya.

Olakunle Alonge, Tingting Ji, Meibin Chen, Takeru Igusa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olakunle AlongeSparkman Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1665 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35233, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7642-2806
Tingting JiDepartment of Civil and Systems Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States.
Meibin ChenDepartment of Civil and Systems Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States.
Takeru IgusaDepartment of Civil and Systems Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-032846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intervention evaluation is critical for determining the value of health interventions; however, real-world implementation frequently falls short of achieving anticipated large-scale impacts. This evidence-to-practice gap often arises from challenges in capturing the complexity inherent in intervention implementation. This complexity may stem from the intervention itself, the dynamic and interrelated processes of dissemination, implementation, and sustainment, or the constraints of real-world settings characterized by interconnected systems. Integrating implementation science, which employs theories, models, and frameworks to understand the adoption and integration of evidence-based interventions, with systems science, which provides tools to model and analyze complex systems, offers a promising pathway for addressing these challenges. However, practical guidance on combining these approaches to evaluate dynamic interactions between interventions and implementation contexts, while simultaneously capturing system-level learnings, remains limited. In this methodological musing, we reflect on our experience integrating systems and implementation science to develop a conceptual and quantitative model for scenario evaluation of a maternal health service delivery redesign initiative in Kakamega, Kenya. We use four research objectives as a touchstone for organizing our reflections, explicated by three steps of an evaluation process: (i) developing a qualitative systems model using implementation frameworks and causal loop diagrams; (ii) constructing and parameterizing a quantitative computational model; and (iii) conducting scenario analyses to explore "what-if" strategies and inform adaptive planning. These reflections highlight the potential strengths of an integrated approach and offer practical considerations for researchers and practitioners evaluating complex health interventions through quantitative modeling and scenario development.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareImplementation ScienceMaternal Health ServicesProgram EvaluationFemaleHumansKenyaimplementation sciencesystems evaluationsystems modelingsystems science

Identifiers

PMID41296770
PMCPMC12906770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.