ArticlePloS one2025
Understanding real and mythical cancer risk factors: Insights from a university-based study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite extensive research on cancer etiology, many cancers remain associated with preventable risk factors. Raising public awareness of these factors is critical for promoting preventive behaviors. This study aimed to assess university students' awareness of both scientifically validated and mythical cancer causes, to identify sociodemographic and health/lifestyle-related factors associated with awareness levels, and to examine the relationship between awareness of evidence-based and mythical cancer risk factors. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 896 students from three Universities in Turkey. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form, the Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM) and Cancer Awareness Measure - Mythical Causes Scale (CAM-MYCS), which evaluates belief in widely held but scientifically unsubstantiated cancer causes (e.g., microwave ovens, stress, artificial sweeteners, electromagnetic frequencies). Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Spearman's correlation, and multiple linear regression. Participants demonstrated significantly higher awareness of scientifically established cancer causes (70.7%) compared to mythical ones (10.2%). A moderate negative correlation was observed between CAM and CAM-MYCS scores (r = -0.511; p < 0.001), indicating that increased awareness of real causes is associated with decreased belief in myths. Regression analysis revealed that CAM scores were significantly predicted by academic year, being in the normal Body Mass Index (BMI) spectrum, and by having attended an oncology course (R² = 0.142; p < 0.001), whereas CAM-MYCS scores were predicted by academic year and high BMI values (R² = 0.072; p < 0.001). These findings highlight the need for targeted educational interventions aimed at both enhancing awareness of factual cancer risk factors and correcting persistent misconceptions. The results provide valuable insights for university-based public health initiatives seeking to improve cancer literacy and promote preventive health and lifestyle behaviors among young adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.