Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41296751›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Time pressure alters takeoff but not landing biomechanics in single-leg countermovement jumps.

Ugur Yilmaz, Huseyin Celik, Pinar Arpinar-Avsar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ugur YilmazDepartment of Biomechanics and Motor Control, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye.
Huseyin CelikDepartment of Biomechanics and Motor Control, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8316-6468
Pinar Arpinar-AvsarDepartment of Biomechanics and Motor Control, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5318-3494

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined how time pressure influences lower-limb biomechanics during single-leg maximal countermovement jumps (CMJs), with a focus on kinetic and kinematic responses during both jumping and landing phases. Participants performed single-leg CMJs under two conditions: self-paced (SP) and reaction-time (RT), the latter simulating time-constrained environments. Joint angles, ground reaction forces (vGRF), and joint moments were analyzed. Significant differences emerged between SP and RT tasks in jumping-phase kinetics and kinematics, with only kinematic differences present during landing. The RT condition led to reduced hip and knee flexion, increased peak vGRF, and shorter flight times, yet no improvement in jump height. This suggests inefficient energy transfer possibly due to reduced range of motion and increased muscle co-contraction or pretension strategies. Joint moment analysis revealed a shift from a hip-dominant strategy in SP to a knee-dominant strategy in RT. Landing in RT was characterized by reduced joint flexion and increased frontal plane loading, potentially elevating the risk of lower-limb injury. Time pressure modifies motor strategies in single-leg CMJs, promoting faster execution at the cost of performance efficiency. These findings underscore the importance of training for both explosive performance and neuromuscular control under time-constrained, sport-specific conditions.

Indexed as

LegLower ExtremityAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMovementRange of Motion, ArticularReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41296751
PMCPMC12654891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.