ArticlePloS one2025
Assessment of awareness and attitudes of pregnant women toward labor epidural analgesia and factors influencing the decision to opt for it: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidural Analgesia and Its Impact on the Duration of the Second Stage of Labor, Vacuum Extraction Delivery, and Neonatal Apgar Scores: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Feasibility of the OdonAssist device for assisted vaginal birth in a low-resource setting: ASSIST Ethiopia study protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpidural analgesia is one of the most effective forms of pain relief for active first stage and second stages of labor. Despite its many advantages, the technique is not routinely practiced in most centers in developing countries. Awareness and attitudes toward it, as well as the reasons for its limited utilization, have not been explored in our setting. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the awareness and attitudes of pregnant women toward labor epidurals and to assess the factors influencing their decision to receive labor epidural analgesia (LEA) during labor and delivery.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from June 03 to August 30, 2024 at Hemen Medical Center. A structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. A systematic sampling method was used to collect the data. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results, and both bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions were employed to identify factors influencing their decision to receive labor epidural analgesia during labor and delivery. A p-value of < 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance.
resultsTwo hundred thirty pregnant women, with a mean age of 29.9 ± 4.3 years, were included in the analysis. Approximately 78% of the participants had heard of labor epidural analgesia (LEA), although only 6.5% reported healthcare providers as their primary source of information. Approximately 47% believed that LEA was effective for pain relief during labor. However, only 14.3% expressed a willingness to consider using LEA during delivery. Education level, family income, perceived risk to the Fetus, and perceived effectiveness in relieving pain were identified as factors influencing the decision to consider LEA during delivery.
conclusionDespite relatively high basic awareness of LEA, many participants remain hesitant to utilize it during labor and delivery. Comprehensive health education and counselling during antenatal care are essential to address misconceptions and promote informed decision-making regarding LEA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.